Breadcrumb Path Hyperlinks
OpinionColumnists
Article content material
By: Lloyd Brown-John
This has been an uncommon winter in Canada. We’ve had little snow and a few rain.
Article content material
Some areas of Canada, together with southeast Alberta and southwest Saskatchewan, are experiencing a winter with little snow — very important for moisture for crops.
In line with Agriculture Canada’s “Canadian Drought Monitor” many prairie areas plus a number of areas in B.C. are beneath extreme to excessive drought warnings. Components of Ontario and far of New Brunswick are experiencing abnormally dry to average drought situations.
Commercial 2
Article content material
After widespread and terrifying wild fires in the summertime of 2023, advance coaching and preparation for one more summer season of warmth, fires and smoke is underway, significantly in western Canada.
In line with the Insurance coverage Bureau of Canada, extreme climate in Canada in 2023 induced an estimated $3.1 billion in insured injury. Uninsured damages might run one other billion {dollars}.
In line with the Climate Community: “The yr 2023 in Canada gained’t be forgotten … due to many excessive occasions that transpired. From record-breaking wildfires and warmth to the nation’s strongest twister in 5 years, it was a memorable 12 months.”
Therefore the query: are these uncommon climate happenings a consequence of local weather change? And it follows, “if that’s the case, how will we address local weather change?”
It is a severe public coverage challenge. However one of the best Canada’s Conservatives can give you is Poilievre’s “Axe The Tax” slogan. Mindlessly echoed by some protesters in Windsor and elsewhere.
Conservative MP Kelly McCauley (Edmonton West), chair of the Authorities Operations and Estimates committee, prolonged an invite to provincial premiers to seem and denounce the Liberal authorities’s carbon tax.
Commercial 3
Article content material
“Premiers must be welcomed earlier than parliamentary committees and given the chance to testify, particularly on issues of nationwide significance,” McCauley stated.
Displaying as much as denounce the carbon tax have been Conservative premiers Blaine Higgs of New Brunswick, Saskatchewan’s Scott Moe (just about) and, no shock, Alberta’s Danielle Smith. They have been among the many leaders who beforehand launched a constitutional courtroom problem in opposition to the federal authorities’s carbon pricing coverage that ultimately led to a Supreme Court docket of Canada ruling that the federal authorities has the authority to implement a minimal worth on air pollution.
Higgs was quoted by CTV Information as telling the committee: “I’d wish to see the carbon tax gone as a result of I don’t suppose it’s the reply to us enhancing our general emissions and decreasing them.”
Truthful sufficient, Canada’s Conservative premiers oppose the present federal carbon emissions tax. Now keep in mind, most Canadians obtain a Canada Carbon Rebate (CCR) which may be as excessive as $900 yearly for a single taxpayer in Alberta ($1,800 for a household of 4) or $560 in Ontario ($1,120 for a household of 4).
Commercial 4
Article content material
The carbon tax is meant to make polluters pay for air pollution, with revenues used, by way of the CCR, to compensate people and households by offsetting the influence of the carbon tax connected to items.
I belief that Conservative leaders, together with Ontario Premier Doug Ford and Poilievre, would “axe the tax” and thereby additionally axe carbon tax rebates.
Because the premiers ranted, a variety of Canadian economists sought to counter the opposition to, and misinformation about, the carbon tax. In an open letter, they stated that, since federal carbon pricing took impact in 2019, Canada’s GHG (greenhouse gasoline) emissions have fallen by nearly eight per cent. Additionally they said carbon pricing reduces emissions at a decrease price than different approaches.
Finally, this boils right down to a single query for Poilievre, who dismissed the consultants, and his dull-axe tax axers.
What’s Poilievre’s coverage different to carbon pricing that can obtain optimistic local weather change outcomes?
Pricey premiers in opposition to the carbon tax, what alternate coverage have you ever developed that may change a air pollution emissions program that has delivered modest outcomes and partially offsets taxpayers collateral prices of the carbon tax?
Anyone can freely denounce any tax. But when the coverage seems to be edging in direction of a aim of decreasing air pollution and saving our local weather then certainly naysayers have an obligation to provide a viable coverage different.
Up to now, they’ve simply muttered and muddled and demonstrated.
Lloyd Brown-John is a College of Windsor professor emeritus of political science and director of Canterbury ElderCollege. He may be reached at lbj@uwindsor.ca.
Article content material
Share this text in your social community
