Opposition chief Peter Dutton has accused Top Minister Anthony Albanese of “selling out Australia” over his choice to stay tight-lipped at the World Felony Court docket’s (ICC) push to retain an arrest warrant in opposition to Israel’s chief.
It emerged on Monday that the ICC prosecutor in opposition to Israeli Top Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his defence minister Yoav Gallant, and 3 senior Hamas leaders.
Khan mentioned in a observation the warrants in opposition to Netanyahu and Gallant stemmed from alleged conflict crimes, together with “starvation”, “wilful killing”, and “extermination and/or murder”, dedicated in opposition to Palestinians in Gaza.
United States President Joe Biden criticised the go in opposition to Netanyahu and Gallant, pronouncing it was once “outrageous”.
“Whatever this prosecutor might imply, there is no equivalence — none — between Israel and Hamas,” Biden mentioned in a observation.
Requested concerning the ICC’s go to retain arrest warrants on Tuesday, Albanese deflected, telling newshounds: “I don’t comment on court processes in Australia, let alone court processes globally to which Australia is not a party.”
When requested if he affirmative with Biden’s feedback, he repeated that he would now not touch upon courtroom complaints, and reiterated that the government condemned the 7 October assault led through Hamas — — on southern Israel.
“We have called for the release of (Hamas-held) hostages; we’ve called for a humanitarian ceasefire; we’re calling for increased humanitarian aid for the people of Gaza,” Albanese mentioned.
He persisted: “And we’ve called for progress towards an (Israeli-Palestinian) two-state solution. That is where we are concentrating, playing a role where we can in promoting the rights of both Israelis and Palestinians to live in security, in peace, and with prosperity.”
Dutton mentioned on Tuesday that Albanese had “squibbed it” through now not weighing in, as he subsidized Biden’s remarks.
“My view is that Australia should stand shoulder to shoulder with President Biden,” Dutton mentioned. “And he’s shown the strength of leadership to stand up against this equivalence, which is completely and utterly repugnant, to compare the Israeli prime minister to a terrorist organisation leader.”
Dutton mentioned Khan’s go in opposition to the Israeli executive figures was once “antisemitic”, and accused Albanese of “selling out Australia”.
“The prime minister is not showing leadership … in relation to antisemitism, and he’s tarnishing and damaging our international relationships with like-minded nations when he’s not strong enough to stand up alongside President Biden,” Dutton mentioned.
“I very strongly support the comments of Joe Biden today … this action is antisemitic,” he mentioned.
Power Minister Chris Bowen referred to as Dutton’s feedback “highly irresponsible” and accused him of dragging the status “through a domestic political debate”.
“I respect the International Criminal Court and I respect the work they do. International law must be respected and, of course, [it] was not respected by Hamas. Israel must respect international law,” Bowen informed Sky Information.
“International law must always be observed and nobody gets a free pass for that.”
World Felony Court docket prosecutor Karim Khan. Supply: AAP / Mauricio Duenas Castaneda/EPA
Khan additionally alleged that two Hamas political leaders, Yahya Sinwar and Ismail Haniyeh — plus Mohammed Deif, who heads Hamas’ armed wing — have been “criminally responsible for the killing of hundreds of Israeli civilians” right through the assaults of seven October 2023.
It was once later that Hamas-led gunmen killed round 1,200 nation and took greater than 250 hostages, in keeping with the Israeli executive.
Israel’s next bombardment of Gaza has killed greater than 35,000 Palestinians, in keeping with Gaza’s fitness ministry, and plunged the i’m busy Palestinian area right into a deep humanitarian extremity.
“We submit that the crimes against humanity charged were part of a widespread and systematic attack against the civilian population of Israel by Hamas and other armed groups pursuant to organisational policies,” Khan’s observation mentioned.
A panel of 3 judges will come to a decision whether or not to factor the arrest warrants and make allowance a case to travel. The judges in most cases speed two months to construct such selections.
Hamas mentioned it “strongly condemns” the ICC prosecutor’s utility for arrest warrants in opposition to its leaders — however mentioned it supported the ICC’s go in opposition to Netanyahu and Gallant.
Netanyahu referred to as the prosecutor’s accusations in opposition to him a “disgrace,” and an assault at the Israeli army and all of Israel. He vowed to press forward with Israel’s conflict in opposition to Hamas.
South Africa, which to logo Israel’s attack on Gaza a genocide — a price Israel strongly unwanted — welcomed the arrest warrant requests and mentioned the regulation will have to “be applied equally to all”.
Germany mentioned the applying for the arrest warrants on the similar day gave a “false impression of equivalence” between Hamas and Israel, a controversy echoed through Jewish teams and the Opposition in Australia.
Former ICC prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo unwanted such an statement.
“The prosecutor is not saying they’re equal, they’re saying both are suspects,” he informed ABC Radio on Tuesday.
The occuring together charging was once additionally a part of a prosecutor’s task to turn impartiality, he mentioned.
The applying for the warrants was once welcomed through the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils and the Australian Muslim Advocacy Community, which also known as for sanctions.
Australian Jewish Affiliation CEO Robert Gregory referred to as for sanctions in opposition to the prosecutor and people who assisted him.
With the Australian Related Press and Agence France-Presse.