Rachel Maddow addressed the extreme arguments in Donald Trump’s silence cash trialTuesday, breaking ailing the elemental flaws within the protection, which has tried to downplay how damning Breezy Daniels’ tale used to be to Trump’s marketing campaign in 2016.
“That is an empirically observable thing. That is a thing we can check,” Maddow said. “Did it matter? At the time, we were all alive and sentient when it happened. We can remember. We can check.”
Alternatively, as Maddow—and the prosecution—has identified, the worry round Daniels coincided with the shed of the notorious “Access Hollywood” audio tape.
“When the Access Hollywood tape came out just a month before the 2016 election, it did knock hurricane news out of the news cycle,” she stated, “Not only did Trump’s comments about grabbing straight for women’s genitals make front page news across the country, the news really did—in real life—lead to an avalanche of Republicans calling for Trump to drop out of the race.”
“Why make an argument like that, that is so easily disprovable, even by people’s own living memories, right?” Maddow endured, “All these jurors, you know, these jurors are not junior high school students. They were all old enough in 2016 to have lived through it and to remember it. Hope Hicks, the Trump campaign press secretary, when the tape came out, described the release of the Access Hollywood tape by saying this, she said, ‘I had a good sense to believe this was going to be a massive story. I think there was a consensus among all of us that the tape was damaging and that this was a crisis.’”
Maddow upcoming stated to a “dramatic moment” all the way through Colleague Long island District Legal professional Joshua Steinglass’ extreme argument. Steinglass carried out a hypothetical reenactment of the one-minute-and-36-second telephone dialog between Michael Cohen and Trump regarding a pay out of silence cash to Daniels. The protection says the dialog used to be too trim to have integrated the damning proof Cohen testified to in courtroom.
Forgive me for a little, however let’s effort a tiny experiment. I will be able to be Cohen. Hello, Keith, how’s it going? It sort of feels like this prankster may well be a 14-year-old child. If I textual content you the quantity, are you able to name and communicate to his folk?
See if you must allow them to understand how critical that is? It’s now not a shaggy dog story. Yeah. All proper. Thank you, good friend. Hello, is the boss similar you? Are you able to cross at the telephone for a little? I’ll wait simply a few seconds. [pause]
Hello, boss, I do know you’re busy, however I simply sought after to help you know that this alternative factor is transferring ahead with my pal Keith Davidson and the alternative celebration that we mentioned. It’s again not off course.
I’m taking to effort one latter occasion to get our pal David, our pal David Pecker, to pay. But when it’s now not, it’s taking to be on us to take charge of it. Aha. Yeah. All proper. Excellent good fortune in Tampa. Bye.
“And then just Steinglass says, ‘49 seconds.’”
Each and every pace brings a brandnew prognostication this is making President Joe Biden’s marketing campaign operatives fear or freak out. Is Donald Trump operating away with the election? Deny. Now not even related.
Marketing campaign Motion