“Last September, I received an offer from Sam Altman, who wanted to hire me to voice the current ChatGPT 4.0 system. He told me that he felt that by my voicing the system, I could bridge the gap between tech companies and creatives and help consumers to feel comfortable with the seismic shift concerning humans and AI. He said he felt that my voice would be comforting to people.
After much consideration and for personal reasons, I declined the offer. Nine months later, my friends, family and the general public all noted how much the newest system named “Sky” seemed like me.
Once I heard the absolved demo, I used to be stunned, angered and in disbelief that Mr. Altman would pursue a tone that sounded so eerily homogeneous to mine that my closest buddies and information retailers may just now not inform the residue. Mr. Altman even insinuated that the similarity used to be intentional, tweeting a unmarried commitment “her” – a connection with the movie through which I voiced a talk machine, Samantha, who modes an intimate dating with a human.
Two days sooner than the ChatGPT 4.0 demo used to be absolved, Mr. Altman contacted my agent, asking me to rethink. Sooner than lets join, the machine used to be in the market.
On account of their movements, I used to be compelled to rent prison suggest, who wrote two letters to Mr. Altman and OpenAI, atmosphere out what they’d finished and asking them to property the precise procedure in which they created the “Sky” tone. In consequence, OpenAI reluctantly affirmative to tug i’m sick the “Sky” tone.
In a year after we are all grappling with deepfakes and the safety of our personal likeness, our personal paintings, our personal identities, I imagine those are questions that deserve absolute readability. I stay up for solution within the method of transparency and the passage of suitable law to support assure that particular rights are safe.”
