Engagement rings usually develop into an issue of dialogue when the receiver doesn’t find it irresistible, however one lady had a weakness then she found out she was once paying for her personal ring.
In a up to date Reddit put up shared to the pervasive “Am I The A**hole?” subreddit, a spouse defined that she and her husband were given married in no time on the courthouse following the proposal and made the verdict to position her virtually $8,000 ring on a fee plan.
Quickly then getting married, she found out that he was once retreating cash from their joint account to pay for the hoop, which the 2 of them have other evaluations on.
“I was just taken aback and honestly put off by the fact he is making me pay for a GIFT he gave to me,” she wrote in her Reddit put up.
“We have been having some arguments lately, and he feels that ring is a wedding expense, and it’s only fair that I contribute towards it too, and that as a woman of this day, I shouldn’t hesitate to be an equal partner. I call bulls*** and shared my thoughts on this whole thing.”
She defined that the recipient of a present will have to by no means pay for it and nearest added that during “most modern societies” an engagement ring is thought of as a present. “I’ve unintentionally partially paid for two installments now which makes me a part-owner of the ring,” the put up persisted.
The poster discussed that had her husband mentioned paying for the hoop this fashion ahead of buying it, she would’ve instructed him “no” as a result of usually “jointly-owned” pieces require each events to comply with it.
AITA for demanding my husband returns my engagement ring to the store because he is making me pay for it through our joint account?
byu/Throwrapaidforring inAITAH
“So I can retroactively decide now I never wanted to own it and have been demanding that my husband returns the ring to the store if paying for the ring hurts his pocket so much,” the spouse wrote.
“This caused him to flare up, and he berated me for being sexist towards him. I put my foot down not because I can’t afford it or I refuse to financially contribute or give my husband a nice gift, but my husband’s sheer stubbornness and tackiness about wanting me to pay is what p***es me off. I don’t mind splurging for him, but this whole situation has left a very bad taste in my mouth.”
Next posting, many crowd left feedback pointing out that there have been wrongdoings from each her and her husband, as he will have to’ve communicated his worth considerations to get her a hoop she sought after, and he or she shouldn’t have “demanded” a hoop that was once that dear.
“Yes, you should consent before being charged something. In further consideration, I could see how she should have consented to jointly paying, but there have been a few posts asking if all accounts were merged and this is the only account he can draw from,” one remark started.
“Overall, her logic is so off. She’s made two payments through the joint account, ‘so now she’s a part owner’ of the ring?? It was a gift, so wasn’t she always THE owner? Or did she maintain he owned the ring even if he gave it to her? To me, demanding someone gift you something you wouldn’t pay for yourself due to cost is scammy/bad faith/tacky – all things she’s accusing her new husband of being.”
“I’m not really sure I understand your reasoning,” some other remark learn. “If paying for something out of your joint account means you’re paying for it indirectly, and that makes it not a gift, then neither of you can ever give each other gifts again. Your finances are MERGED. What’s his is yours and yours is his. That’s how my wife and I function anyway.
“Because what he did seems relatively… normal? Buying the kind of ring your partner wants and financing it if you’re saving up for a house seems pretty standard, definitely not a ‘plot to get back at you’. It seems like he’s trapped in a no-win situation here.”
